Thursday, March 6, 2014

The Face Behind Bitcoin

Satoshi Nakamoto stands at the end of his sunbaked driveway looking timorous.


And annoyed.

He’s wearing a rumpled T-shirt, old blue jeans and white gym socks, without shoes, like he has left the house in a hurry. His hair is unkempt, and he has the thousand-mile stare of someone who has gone weeks without sleep.

He stands not with defiance, but with the slackness of a person who has waged battle for a long time and now faces a grave loss.

Two police officers from the Temple City, Calif., sheriff’s department flank him, looking puzzled. “So, what is it you want to ask this man about?” one of them asks me. “He thinks if he talks to you he’s going to get into trouble.”

“I don’t think he’s in any trouble,” I say. “I would like to ask him about Bitcoin. This man is Satoshi Nakamoto.”

“What?” The police officer balks. “This is the guy who created Bitcoin? It looks like he’s living a pretty humble life.”

I’d come here to try to find out more about Nakamoto and his humble life. It seemed ludicrous that the man credited with inventing Bitcoin – the world’s most wildly successful digital currency, with transactions of nearly $500 million a day at its peak – would retreat to Los Angeles’s San Bernardino foothills, hole up in the family home and leave his estimated $400 million of Bitcoin riches untouched. It seemed similarly implausible that Nakamoto’s first response to my knocking at his door would be to call the cops. Now face to face, with two police officers as witnesses, Nakamoto’s responses to my questions about Bitcoin were careful but revealing.

Tacitly acknowledging his role in the Bitcoin project, he looks down, staring at the pavement and categorically refuses to answer questions.

“I am no longer involved in that and I cannot discuss it,” he says, dismissing all further queries with a swat of his left hand. “It’s been turned over to other people. They are in charge of it now. I no longer have any connection.”

Nakamoto refused to say any more, and the police made it clear our conversation was over.

But a two-month investigation and interviews with those closest to Nakamoto and the developers who worked most frequently with him on the out-of-nowhere global phenomenon that is Bitcoin reveal the myths surrounding the world’s most famous crypto-currency are largely just that – myths – and the facts are much stranger than the well-established fiction.

Far from leading to a Tokyo-based whiz kid using the name “Satoshi Nakamoto” as a cipher or pseudonym (a story repeated by everyone from Bitcoin’s rabid fans to The New Yorker), the trail followed by Newsweek led to a 64-year-old Japanese-American man whose name really is Satoshi Nakamoto. He is someone with a penchant for collecting model trains and a career shrouded in secrecy, having done classified work for major corporations and the U.S. military.

Standing before me, eyes downcast, appeared to be the father of Bitcoin.

Not even his family knew.


There are several Satoshi Nakamotos living in North America and beyond – both dead and alive – including a Ralph Lauren menswear designer in New York and another who died in Honolulu in 2008, according to the Social Security Index’s Death Master File. There’s even one on LinkedIn who claims to have started Bitcoin and is based in Japan. But none of these profiles seem to fit other known details and few of the leads proved credible. Of course, there is also the chance “Satoshi Nakamoto” is a pseudonym, but that raises the question why someone who wishes to remain anonymous would choose such a distinctive name. It was only while scouring a database that contained the registration cards of naturalized U.S. citizens that a Satoshi Nakamoto turned up whose profile and background offered a potential match. But it was not until after ordering his records from the National Archives and conducting many more interviews that a cohesive picture began to take shape.

Two weeks before our meeting in Temple City, I struck up an email correspondence with Satoshi Nakamoto, mostly discussing his interest in upgrading and modifying model steam trains with computer-aided design technologies. I obtained Nakamoto’s email through a company he buys model trains from.

He has been buying train parts from Japan and England since he was a teenager, saying, “I do machining myself, manual lathe, mill, surface grinders.”

The process also requires a good amount of math, something at which Nakamoto – and his entire family – excels. The eldest of three brothers who all work in engineering and technical fields, Nakamoto graduated from California State Polytechnic University in Pomona, Calif., with a degree in physics. But unlike his brothers, his circuitous career path is very hard to trace.

Nakamoto ceased responding to emails I’d sent him immediately after I began asking about Bitcoin. This was in late February. Before that, I’d also asked about his professional background, for which there is very little to be found in the public record. I only received evasive answers. When he asked about my background, I told him I’d be happy to elaborate over the phone and called him to introduce myself. When there was no response, I asked his oldest son, Eric Nakamoto, 31, to reach out and see whether his father would talk about Bitcoin. The message came back he would not. Attempts through other family members also failed.


After that, Nakamoto disregarded my requests to speak by phone and did not return calls. The day I arrived at his modest, single-family home in southern California, his silver Toyota Corolla CE was parked in the driveway but he didn’t answer the door.

At one point he did peer out, cracking open the door screen and making eye contact briefly. Then he shut it. That was the only time I saw him without police officers in attendance.

“You want to know about my amazing physicist brother?” says Arthur Nakamoto, Satoshi Nakamoto’s youngest sibling, who works as director of quality assurance at Wavestream Corp., a maker of radio frequency amplifiers in San Dimas, Calif.

“He’s a brilliant man. I’m just a humble engineer. He’s very focused and eclectic in his way of thinking. Smart, intelligent, mathematics, engineering, computers. You name it, he can do it.”

But he also had a warning.

“My brother is an asshole. What you don’t know about him is that he’s worked on classified stuff. His life was a complete blank for a while. You’re not going to be able to get to him. He’ll deny everything. He’ll never admit to starting Bitcoin.”

And with that, Nakamoto’s brother hung up.


I plainly needed to talk to Satoshi Nakamoto face to face.

Bitcoin is a currency that lives in the world of computer code and can be sent anywhere in the world without racking up bank or exchange fees, and is then stored on a cellphone or hard drive until used again. Because the currency resides in code, it can also be lost when a hard drive crashes, or stolen if someone else accesses the keys to the code.

“The whole reason geeks get excited about Bitcoin is that it is the most efficient way to do financial transactions,” says Bitcoin’s chief scientist, Gavin Andresen, 47. He acknowledges that Bitcoin’s ease of use can also lead to easy theft and that it is safest when stored in a safe-deposit box or on a hard drive that’s not connected to the Internet. “For anyone who’s tried to wire money overseas, you can see how much easier an international Bitcoin transaction is. It’s just as easy as sending an email.”

Even so, Bitcoin is vulnerable to massive theft, fraud and scandal, which has seen the price of Bitcoins whipsaw from more than $1,200 each last year to as little as $130 in late February.

The currency has attracted the attention of the U.S. Senate, the Department of Homeland Security, the Federal Reserve, the Internal Revenue Service, the Treasury Department’s Financial Crimes Enforcement Network, the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Bureau of Investigation, which in October shuttered the online black market Silk Road and seized its $3.5 million cache of Bitcoin. “The FBI is now one of the largest holders of Bitcoin in the world,” Andresen says.

In recent weeks, a revived version of Silk Road as well as one of Bitcoin’s biggest exchanges, Tokyo-based Mt. Gox, shut down and filed for bankruptcy after attacks by hackers drained each of millions of dollars.

Andresen, a Silicon Valley refugee in Amherst, Mass., says he worked closely with the person “or entity” known as Satoshi Nakamoto on the development of Bitcoin from June 2010 to April 2011. This was before the rise of today’s multibillion-dollar Bitcoin economy, boosted last year by the unexpected, if cautious, endorsement of outgoing Federal Reserve chair Ben Bernanke, who said virtual currencies “may hold long-term promise.”

Since then, Bitcoin ATMs have been cropping up across North America (with some of the first in Vancouver, British Columbia; Boston; and Albuquerque, N.M.) while the acceptance of Bitcoin has spread to businesses as diverse as Tesla, OkCupid, Reddit, Overstock.com and Virgin Galactic, Richard Branson’s aviation company, which has said it will blast people into space if they cough up enough Bitcoin.

“Working on Bitcoin’s core code is really scary, actually, because if you wreck something, you can break this huge $8 billion project,” says Andresen. “And that’s happened. We have broken it in the past.”

For nearly a year, Andresen corresponded with the founder of Bitcoin a few times a week, often putting in 40-hour weeks refining the Bitcoin code. Throughout their correspondence, Nakamoto’s evasiveness was his hallmark, Andresen says.

In fact, he never even heard Nakamoto’s voice, because the founder of Bitcoin would not communicate by phone. Their interactions, he says, always took place by “email or private message on the Bitcointalk forum,” where enthusiasts meet online.

“He was the kind of person who, if you made an honest mistake, he might call you an idiot and never speak to you again,” Andresen says. “Back then, it was not clear that creating Bitcoin might be a legal thing to do. He went to great lengths to protect his anonymity.”

Nakamoto also ignored all of Andresen’s questions about where he was from, his professional background, what other projects he’d worked on and whether his name was real or a pseudonym (many of Bitcoin’s devotees use pseudonyms). “He was never chatty,” Andresen says. “All we talked about was code.”

Andresen, an Australian who graduated from Princeton with a Bachelor’s in computer science, eventually became Nakamoto’s point person on a growing team of international coders and programmers who worked on a volunteer basis to perfect the Bitcoin code after its inauspicious launch in January 2009.

Andresen originally heard about Bitcoin the following year through a blog he followed. He reached out to Nakamoto through one of the Bitcoin founder’s untraceable email addresses and offered his assistance. His initial message to Bitcoin’s inventor read: “Bitcoin is a brilliant idea, and I want to help. What do you need?”

Andresen says he didn’t give much thought to working for an anonymous inventor. “I am a geek,” he says simply. “I don’t care if the idea came from a good person or an evil person. Ideas stand on their own.”

Other developers were driven by “enlightened self-interest,” profit or personal politics, he says. But nearly all were intrigued by the promise of a digital currency accessible to anyone in the world that could bypass central banks at a time when the global financial system was on life support. In this respect, the launch of Bitcoin could not have been better timed.

In 2008, just before Bitcoin’s official kickoff, a somewhat stiffly written, nine-page proposal found its way onto the Internet bearing the name and email address of Satoshi Nakamoto.

The paper proposed “electronic cash” that “would allow online payments to be sent directly from one party to another without going through a financial institution,” with transactions time-stamped and viewable to all.

The masterstroke was replacing the role of banks as the trusted middlemen with Bitcoin users, who would act as sentinels for the integrity of the system, verifying transactions using their computing power in exchange for Bitcoin.

Bitcoin production is designed to move at a carefully calibrated pace to boost value and scarcity and remain inflation proof, halving its quantity every four years, and is designed to stop proliferating when Bitcoins reach a total of 21 million in 2140. (Bitcoins can be divided by up to eight decimal places, with the smallest units called “satoshis.”)

“I got the impression that Satoshi was really doing it for political reasons,” says Andresen, who gets paid in Bitcoins – along with a half-dozen other Bitcoin core developers working everywhere from Silicon Valley to Switzerland – by the Bitcoin Foundation, a nonprofit working to standardize the currency.

He doesn’t like the system we have today and wanted a different one that would be more equal. He did not like the notion of banks and bankers getting wealthy just because they hold the keys,” says Andresen.

Holding the keys has also made early comers to Bitcoin wealthy beyond measure. “I made a small investment in Bitcoin and it is actually enough that I could now retire if I wanted to,” Andresen says. “Overall, I’ve made about $800 per penny I’ve invested. It’s insane.”

One of the first people to start working with Bitcoin’s founder in 2009 was Martti Malmi, 25, a Helsinki programmer who invested in Bitcoins. “I sold them in 2011 and bought a nice apartment,” he says. “Today, I could have bought 100 nice apartments.”

Communication with Bitcoin’s founder was becoming less frequent by early 2011. Nakamoto stopped posting changes to the Bitcoin code and ignored conversations on the Bitcoin forum.

Andresen was unprepared, however, for Satoshi Nakamoto’s reaction to an email exchange between them on April 26, 2011.

“I wish you wouldn’t keep talking about me as a mysterious shadowy figure,” Nakamoto wrote to Andresen. “The press just turns that into a pirate currency angle. Maybe instead make it about the open source project and give more credit to your dev contributors; it helps motivate them.”

Andresen responded: “Yeah, I’m not happy with the ‘wacky pirate money’ tone, either.”

Then he told Nakamoto he’d accepted an invitation to speak at the Central Intelligence Agency headquarters. “I hope that by talking directly to them and, more importantly, listening to their questions/concerns, they will think of Bitcoin the way I do – as a just-plain-better, more efficient, less-subject-to-political-whims money,” he said. “Not as an all-powerful black-market tool that will be used by anarchists to overthrow the System.”

From that moment, Satoshi Nakamoto stopped responding to emails and dropped off the map.

Nakamoto’s family describe him as extremely intelligent, moody and obsessively private, a man of few words who screens his phone calls, anonymizes his emails and, for most of his life, has been preoccupied with the two things for which Bitcoin has now become known: money and secrecy.

For the past 40 years, Satoshi Nakamoto has not used his birth name in his daily life. At the age of 23, after graduating from California State Polytechnic University, he changed his name to “Dorian Prentice Satoshi Nakamoto,” according to records filed with the U.S. District Court of Los Angeles in 1973. Since then, he has not used the name Satoshi but instead signs his name “Dorian S. Nakamoto.”

Descended from Samurai and the son of a Buddhist priest, Nakamoto was born in July 1949 in the city of Beppu, Japan, where he was brought up poor in the Buddhist tradition by his mother, Akiko. In 1959, after a divorce and remarriage, she immigrated to California, taking her three sons with her. Now age 93, she lives with Nakamoto in Temple City.

Nakamoto did not get along with his stepfather, but his aptitude for math and science was evident from an early age, says Arthur, who also notes, “He is fickle and has very weird hobbies.”

Just after graduating college, Nakamoto went to work on defense and electronics communications for Hughes Aircraft in southern California. “That was just the beginning,” says Arthur, who also worked at Hughes. “He is the only person I have ever known to show up for a job interview and tell the interviewer he’s an idiot – and then prove it.”

Nakamoto has six children. The first, a son from his first marriage in the 1980′s, is Eric Nakamoto, an animation and 3-D graphics designer in Philadelphia. His next five children were with his second wife, Grace Mitchell, 56, who lives in Audubon, N.J., and says she met Nakamoto at a Unitarian church mixer in Cherry Hill, N.J., in the mid-1980s. She recalls he came to the East Coast after leaving Hughes Aircraft, now part of Raytheon, in his 20s and next worked for Radio Corporation of America in Camden, N.J., as a systems engineer.

“We were doing defensive electronics and communications for the military, government aircraft and warships, but it was classified and I can’t really talk about it,” confirms David Micha, president of the company now called L-3 Communications.

Mitchell says her husband “did not talk much about his work” and sometimes took on military projects independent of RCA. In 1987, the couple moved back to California, where Nakamoto worked as a computer engineer for communications and technologies companies in the Los Angeles area, including financial information service Quotron Systems Inc., sold in 1994 to Reuters, and Nortel Networks.

Nakamoto, who was laid off twice in the 1990s, according to Mitchell, fell behind on mortgage payments and taxes and their home was foreclosed. That experience, says Nakamoto’s oldest daughter, Ilene Mitchell, 26, may have informed her father’s attitude toward banks and the government.

A libertarian, Nakamoto encouraged his daughter to be independent, start her own business and “not be under the government’s thumb,” she says. “He was very wary of the government, taxes and people in charge.”

She also describes her father as a man who worked all hours, from before the family rose in the morning to late into the night. “He would keep his office locked and we would get into trouble if we touched his computer,” she recalls. “He was always expounding on politics and current events. He loved new and old technology. He built his own computers and was very proud of them.”

Around 2000, Nakamoto and Grace separated, though they have never divorced. They moved back to New Jersey with their five children and Nakamoto worked as a software engineer for the Federal Aviation Administration in New Jersey in the wake of the September 11 attacks, doing security and communications work, says Mitchell.

“It was very secret,” she says. “He left that job sometime in 2001 and I don’t think he’s had a steady job since.”

When the FAA contract ended, Nakamoto moved back to Temple City, where for the rest of that decade things get hazy about what kind of work he undertook.

Ever since Bitcoin rose to prominence there has been a hunt for the real Satoshi Nakamoto. Did he act alone or was he working for the government? Bitcoin has been linked to everything from the National Security Agency to the International Monetary Fund.

Yet, in a world where almost every big Silicon Valley innovation seems to erupt in lawsuits over who thought of it first, in the case of Bitcoin the founder has remained conspicuously silent for the past five years.

“I could see my dad doing something brilliant and not accepting the greater effect of it,” says Ilene Mitchell, who works for Partnerships for Student Achievement in Beaverton, Ore. “But I honestly don’t see him being straight about it. Any normal person would be all over it. But he’s not totally a normal person.”

Nakamoto’s middle brother, Tokuo Nakamoto, who lives near his brother and mother, in Duarte, Calif., agrees. “He is very meticulous in what he does, but he is very afraid to take himself out into the media, so you will have to excuse him,” he says.

Characteristics of Satoshi Nakamoto, the Bitcoin founder, that dovetail with Dorian S. Nakamoto, the computer engineer, are numerous. Those working most closely with Bitcoin’s founder noticed several things: he seemed to be older than the other Bitcoin developers. And he worked alone.

“He didn’t seem like a young person and he seemed to be influenced by a lot of people in Silicon Valley,” says Nakamoto’s Finnish protégé, Martti Malmi. Andresen concurs: “Satoshi’s style of writing code was old-school. He used things like reverse Polish notation.”

In addition, the code was not always terribly neat, another sign that Nakamoto was not working with a team that would have cleaned up the code and streamlined it.

“Everyone who looked at his code has pretty much concluded it was a single person,” says Andresen. “We have rewritten roughly 70 percent of the code since inception. It wasn’t written with nice interfaces. It was like one big hairball. It was incredibly tight and well-written at the lower level but where functions came together it could be pretty messy.”

Satoshi Nakamoto’s 2008 online proposal also hints at his age, with the odd reference to “disk space” – something that hasn’t been an issue since the last millennium – and older research citations of contemporaries’ work going back to 1957.

The Bitcoin code is based on a network protocol that’s been established for decades. Its brilliance is not so much in the code itself, says Andresen, but in the design, which unites functions to reach multiple ends. The punctuation in the proposal is also consistent with how Dorian S. Nakamoto writes, with double spaces after periods and other format quirks.

In the debate between those who claim Nakamoto writes curiously “flawless English” for a Japanese man and those who contend otherwise, writing under both names can swerve wildly between uppercase and lowercase, full spellings and abbreviations, proper English and slang.

In his correspondences and writings, it has widely been noted that Satoshi Nakamoto alternates between British and American spellings – and, depending on his audience, veers between highly abbreviated verbiage and a more formal, polished style. Grace Mitchell says her husband does the same.

Dorian S. Nakamoto’s use of English, she says, was likely influenced by his lifelong interest in collecting model trains, many of which he imported from England as a teenager while he was still learning English.

Mitchell suspects Nakamoto’s initial interest in creating a digital currency that could be used anywhere in the world may have stemmed from his frustration with bank fees and high exchange rates when he was sending international wires to England to buy model trains. “He would always complain about that,” she says. “I would not say he writes flawless English. He will pick up words and mix the spellings.”

Eric, Nakamoto’s oldest son from his first marriage, says he remains torn over whether his father is the founder of Bitcoin, noting that messages from the latter appear more “concise” and “refined than that of my father’s.”

Perhaps the most compelling parallel between the two Nakamotos are their professional skill sets and career timeframes. Andresen says Satoshi Nakamoto told him about how long it took him to develop Bitcoin – a span that falls squarely into Dorian S. Nakamoto’s job lapse starting in 2001. “Satoshi said he’d been working on Bitcoin for years before he launched it,” Andresen says. “I could see the original code taking at least two years to write. He had a revelation that he had solved something no one had solved before.”

Satoshi Nakamoto’s three-year silence also dovetails with health issues suffered by Dorian S. Nakamoto in the past few years, his family says. “It has been hard, because he suffered a stroke several months ago and before that he was dealing with prostate cancer,” says his wife, who works as a critical-care nurse in New Jersey. “He hasn’t seen his kids for the past few years.”

She has been unable to get Nakamoto to speak with her about whether he was the founder of Bitcoin. Eric Nakamoto says his father has denied it. Tokuo and Arthur Nakamoto believe their brother will leave the truth unconfirmed.

“Dorian can just be paranoid,” says Tokuo. “I cannot get through to him. I don’t think he will answer any of these questions to his family truthfully.”

Of course, none of this puts to rest the biggest question of all – the one that only Satoshi Nakamoto himself can answer: What has kept him from spending his hundreds of millions of dollars of Bitcoin, which he reaped when he launched the currency years ago? According to his family both he – and they – could really use the money.

Andresen says if Nakamoto is as concerned about maintaining his anonymity as he remembers the answer might be simple: He does not want to participate in the Bitcoin madness. “If you come out as the leader of Bitcoin, now you have to make appearances and presentations and comments to the press and that didn’t really fit with Satoshi’s personality,” he says. “He didn’t really want to lead it anymore. He was pretty intolerant to incompetence. And he also realized the project would go on without him.”

On the other hand, it is possible Nakamoto simply lost the private security keys to unlock his Bitcoin and cash in on his riches. Andresen, however, says he doubts it. “He was too disciplined,” he says.

If Nakamoto ever sells his Bitcoin fortune, he would likely have to do so at a legitimate Bitcoin bank or exchange, which would not only give away his identity but alert everyone from the IRS to the FBI of his movements. While Bitcoin lets its users conduct transactions anonymously, all transactions can be viewed transparently online – and everyone is watching Nakamoto’s Bitcoin to see if he spends it, says Andresen.

For his part, Andresen says he is inclined to respect Nakamoto’s anonymity. “When programmers get together, we don’t talk about who Satoshi Nakamoto is,” he says. “We talk about how we should have invested in more Bitcoin. I mean, we’re curious about it, but honestly, we really don’t care.”

Calling the possibility her father could also be the father of Bitcoin “flabbergasting,” Ilene Mitchell says she isn’t surprised her father would choose to stay under cover if he was the man behind this venture, especially as he is currently concerned about his health.

“He is very wary of government interference in general,” she says. “When I was little, there was a game we used to play. He would say, ‘Pretend the government agencies are coming after you.’ And I would hide in the closet.”

Forensic analysts Sharon Sergeant and Barbara Mathews contributed to research for this piece.



Is this really tru? well source is here…


source: http://mag.newsweek.com/2014/03/14/bitcoin-satoshi-nakamoto.html



Friday, February 28, 2014

Charlie Shrem Speaks Out About Mt. Gox

“I’ve known Mark Karpeles for a very long time. Mark is a very sweet guy. Very non-confrontational, but has he made bad business decisions? Yes. Has he failed to do everything he should have? Yes.”


So says Charlie Shrem, the troubled bitcoin entrepreneur, speaking to me from his parents’ house in New York, where he’s currently under house arrest.



He tells me he classes Karpeles, CEO of the disastrous bitcoin exchange Mt. Gox, as a good friend, but disagrees with a hell of a lot of the decisions the Frenchman has made.

Mt. Gox has been dying a slow and painful death for some months, but now appears to be taking its final breaths after documents came to light suggesting insolvency and the loss of more than 744,400 bitcoins (around $426m).Shrem believes a number of factors are responsible for the exchange’s current issues, from a lack of PR presence to poor management structure, but first and foremost is the inadequacy of the technology Mt. Gox is built upon. He explained:

“The whole exchange is built on layer upon layer of patchy scrap work – the whole thing is flawed because of the way it was built.”

As for the company’s management structure, Shrem said Karpeles may call himself CEO, but he “doesn’t make any of the business decisions”. Gonzague Gay-Bouchery “pretty much runs the company”, despite his official job title as marketing director.The company has also hired a lot of developers, but any developer code that’s created has to be looked over and checked by Karpeles, creating a bottleneck that has severely hampered progress.Shrem believes the company should have, long ago, hired an agency to handle its PR, but it didn’t, because Karpeles didn’t want anyone to know Mt. Gox’s inner workings (read: didn’t want anyone to know what a dire mess it was in).He acknowledges that Karpeles and Mt. Gox have done a massive disservice to bitcoin, but said, in a strange way, they’ve also done everyone a big favour – Gox’s competitors will learn from the mistakes that have been made and will progress with more robust and technologically sound models.

The 24-year-old admitted he has some bitcoins in Mt. Gox and didn’t sound particularly hopeful that he would ever see them again.However, he’s trying his best to be a good friend to Karpeles at a time when he’s (understandably) being hounded from all angles.And Shrem certainly knows all about that, having been headline fodder for a good few weeks earlier in the year, following his arrest on money laundering charges.


Shrem’s arrest

“I didn’t know what was going on. One minute I was getting off my flight, the next I was being arrested.”

“The way they did it – arresting me at the airport in front of a ton of people – the whole thing was set up to make me look like a criminal,” he said.

Shrem believes his arrest was carefully planned by the federal government to damage the public’s perception of bitcoin. He thinks the media hasn’t helped matters, either, by “making assumptions” and publishing articles “without knowing the full story”.He is alleged to have been involved in a scheme to “sell and launder over $1m in bitcoins” through the now defunct online black market Silk Road.A document published by the Manhattan US Attorney alleged Shrem knew 52-year-old Florida native Robert M Faiella was “operating a bitcoin exchange service for Silk Road users” and that the authorities have email correspondence to prove this.The entrepreneur said the emails have been taken out of context and that the government and media seem to think his company, BitInstant, where he was CEO until recently, was selling bitcoins to Faiella. He stressed:


“That’s not how the business worked – we didn’t actually sell any bitcoins.”

BitInstant was designed to enable people to quickly transfer money to their bitcoin exchange accounts. The way Shrem sees it, Faiella allegedly advertised his services on Silk Road, and would send his customers on to BitInstant.These customers would conduct the transactions themselves, then send the money to their own Mt. Gox accounts. Once on this site, they would buy bitcoins, transfer the bitcoin to their Silk Road account and buy illicit goods.“Now how many times am I removed from that already?” he added.



The case

Having recently resigned from board of the Bitcoin Foundation, Shrem said he is now spending the vast majority of his time focusing on his case and “trying to hang on to my sanity”.

He’s working with his lawyer, Marc Agnifilo of Brafman & Associates, to meticulously comb through the 30-something-page complaint against him and try to work out what exactly the charges against him are.


source: http://www.coindesk.com/exclusive-charlie-shrem-speaks-mt-gox-arrest-bitcoin-bromance/



Thursday, February 27, 2014

Something’s Not Right at ‘Gox

For those living under a rock, a document surfaced which I can confirm is authentic regarding the insolvency of MtGox titled “MtGox Situation Crisis Strategy”


The document essentially claims that MtGox has ‘lost’ 740,000 BTC over the past few years, at currency price of $592 that amounts to $438,080,000 missing, unnoticed for about four years.

Let’s be honest, that kind of money does not just go missing and I’ve been struggling to accept that this is what really happened. On Sunday evening I called my good friend David Perry from CodingInMySleep.com to run the numbers and see if this is physically possible. For More Information, listen to the second half of Tuesdays Let’s Talk Bitcoin!


We concluded:


We find it hard to believe those coins are missing and the basic math alone should refute this. 740k btc since malleability became known in ’11 is 20k+ btc per month, about 675 btc per day. Even at current prices that’s over 300k USD per day, that’s not the kind of money you just misplace and don’t notice. Now, even if we give the “hacker” credit and suggest they’ve been doing it since the day gox opened that’s still a quarter million per day. In fairness the hackers could have taken a lot more coins when they were less valuable and dialed it back now that the USD value per coin is higher but it still works out to an average of 509 coins per day, if they started the day Gox opened shop. Even when coins were $0.05 that’s still almost $1,000 per month their books wouldn’t balance by. Were talking about 6% of all coins in existence, or ten times the amount of money in any known bitcoin address. If they’ve stolen that much money over that much time the law of averages kicks in, they’d be buying at the median market price for the entire 4 year span, which is $95.49 per coin for a daily take of $48,629.01. If you stole $48,629.01 worth of btc from Gox every day for 4 years, you arrive at 744,000 btc and they couldn’t have stolen the bulk of it right at the start because that many BTC didn’t exist 4 years ago. I’ve seen many emails and blog posts come across my inbox trying to explain what happened, but this is by far the best explanation I have seen.


LTB Listener @Napoleon sent this note :


Adam,

I’m listening to the latest LTB episode, and am presently paused at the point where Charlie Shrem is doing the math on how many bitcoins would have needed to have been stolen per day since Mt Gox’s inception for the 740,000 bitcoins to have disappeared. I believe I “deduced the MtGox situation” Tuesday morning. Only when I heard Charlie talk about it on the podcast and realized that even Mark’s friends didn’t know what was going on did I realize that I should reach out to someone. I rather cynically assumed that insiders were in-the-know and that many others would come to my conclusions soon enough. Perhaps I’m wrong, but because nobody else is talking about it I feel obliged to pass this through you to Charlie — who might be able to act on it.


Simple theory that is plausible and explains some of Mark’s behavior & statements:


Summary


1. A substantial amount of the missing 740k bitcoins are still in addresses that MtGox believed they had control over

2. Transaction malleability thefts did take place, but not nearly 740k coins

3. MtGox believed they were solvent because their watch-wallet continued and continues to show expected cold storage balances

4. MtGox’s deepest coldest-cold storage reserves were never tested until the transaction malleability situation

5. MtGox can not recover the keys to the coldest-cold storage. (possibly a software problem.. custom deterministic wallet? or some other hardware/organization failure)

6. Mark has reason to think that the keys might be recoverable

7. The 2,000 odd coins mentioned in the crisis document represent whats left of the first stage cold wallet/hot wallet coins


Background & Assumptions


I am not familiar with MtGox’s cold wallet management. I have never talked to anyone at MtGox or anyone knowledgeable about MtGox’s practices.

It is preposterous to imagine that 740k bitcoins were lost over any amount of time without anyone noticing. Zero percent likelihood. It is certainly possible that there has been a major coverup and fraud. My theory is the only answer I can come up with that is both plausible and does not involve massive fraud.


Theory


Different Cold Wallets


An operation at MtGox’s size and growth rate requires relatively few coins to satisfy customer withdraws at any given moment. For this reason, MtGox likely has a multi-tiered wallet system that is more complicated than simply a hot wallet and a cold wallet. Perhaps only 5%-20% of customer funds are required to be quickly accessible at any given moment, and perhaps these are split between a cold wallet and a hot wallet. For the vast majority of customer funds there exists a coldest-cold wallet. This coldest-cold wallet is never tapped, while the normal offline transaction signing process is used for the first stage cold wallet to hot wallet transfers.


Cold Wallets Are Watched


All cold wallets are set up in a watch-wallet format, and they balance. The cold wallet is regularly tapped, but with the growth of the site, it never requires the coldest-cold wallet funds. The coldest-cold wallet only grows over time — possibly representing some fixed percentage of total customer funds.


Malleability Hacks


Transaction malleability hacks have been taking place for some period of time, and MtGox was alerted to them. The cold wallet was mostly depleted in this process and for the first time in a long time, perhaps for the first time ever, the coldest-cold wallet was tapped to refill the cold wallet. It was then discovered that the coldest-cold wallet private keys were not functional or were missing.


Private Keys


There are any number of different reasons why the coldest-cold wallet’s keys are wrong/missing/corrupted. Perhaps there is a problem with the elliptic curve in the PHP custom wallet software. Perhaps a drive failed, perhaps a USB key was wiped, or just plain lost. Any number of reasons.


If it is a software problem with a custom wallet, then perhaps Mark believes he might be able to correct it and generate the correct private keys. If it is a data-loss problem then perhaps he thinks it is recoverable in some way.


Fiat Asset & Liabilities Imbalance


There are several ways to account for the shocking difference between the USD assets and liabilities, none strike me as ethical/legal. My guess is that it is the result of an ill-advised plan to continue trading during a sell-off while using customer funds to buy cheap BTC under the assumption that the private keys to the coldest-cold storage would be recovered. This is roughly what MF Global did.


Misc Observations


There was no evidence that hundreds of thousands of coins were missing when Roger Ver made the so-called “hostage” video six months ago. If the transaction malleability problem was being used to steal hundreds of thousands of coins from MtGox, it would have had to have been done over the last half year in substantial amounts. There is good reason to believe that whatever cold-storage solution MtGox has developed that there are wallets which may have not been tested for months or years. Very few coins would be required to be in first stage cold or hot wallets in order to run the operation. There is good reason to believe that Mark can fuck up essential code. Depending on the nature of the theoretical wallet bug, it is possible that early tests of public/private pairs were successful, and only later did the wallet software begin producing incorrect private keys.


If MtGox was watching the public addresses of their coldest-cold wallets then they would have had no reason to be concerned, and accounting would have balanced right up until the end.


The transaction malleability thefts likely occurred. But there is little possibility these thefts included many hundreds of thousands of coins and were not noticed over an extended period of time — or that MtGox would not question shifting 99.5% of BTC reserves out of a cold wallet over a short period of time. If this continues to be the story, then it is very likely that Mark is involved in a massive fraud.


Burned Coins


If my theory is basically correct then majority of the coins are either lost forever due to key mismanagement — or they are possibly recoverable. If they are lost forever, I can imagine why Mark would mislead even his close friends out of embarrassment and suggest that all of the coins were stolen. If they are lost forever I can imagine why Mark might delude himself into believing they might be recoverable. If they might be recoverable, I can imagine why Mark would want to keep it private until he recovered them — even parsing words : “Well technically they’re not ‘lost’ just yet, just temporarily unavailable.” If it is likely that they are recoverable, I can imagine why a venture firm would agree to purchase a company in MtGox’s state.

If my theory is basically correct and Mark is hiding this information while he attempts to recover the keys on his own, then Charlie might be able to convince him to allow other people to help.

If the coins are burned and lost forever, then the demise of MtGox is quite a different story for the markets than it is now. Of course it means that there are considerably fewer bitcoins than were assumed to be available for trade a few days ago. Everyone’s coins are that much more scarce.


–


I run a small IRC channel on a home server for some friends, and when I floated this theory to them on Tuesday morning, one of them took the idea to #bitcoin on Freenode. In fact, you probably know my friend. My friend posted a single sentence summary in heavy chat traffic: “What if MtGox simply lost the coins due to an EC bug in their custom wallet implementation?” Within seconds a developer pounced on him with questions: “What is your source?… Who told you this?.. Tell me what you know…” They ended up in private chat where my friend informed the developer that it was just speculation by a friend with no inside knowledge. It turns out that the developer has a friend who has had much the same problem before, and his immediate interest suggests to me that he considers the theory plausible, too. For what it’s worth, I have no coins or fiat stuck at MtGox — nor do I know anyone with anything stuck at Gox.


The theft story just can not account for the totality of the missing funds — and I think that it is much more likely that something like what I have described above is happening. And it is at least possible that if I am correct, and if Mark is hiding this fact, that an intervention could lead to smart professionals recovering private keys and saving the day.



source: http://letstalkbitcoin.com/somethings-not-right-at-gox/



Mark Karpeles: 'I Am Still In Japan'

Mark Karpeles, the chief executive of troubled Bitcoin exchange Mt Gox, has sought to calm market concerns by insisting he remains in Japan, where the company is based.


Karpeles says he is working hard with technical teams to solve a major security issue, which forced an operational shutdown at the company. Some 744,408 Bitcoins, worth over $350 million, were allegedly lost or stolen, owing to a technical problem. The security problems have seen angry customers flooding internet forums as well as protesting outside Mt Gox offices, demanding their money back. Some even suggested Karpeles might have fled Japan in the wake of the problems, a claim he denies. In a statement posted online today, Mt Gox CEO Mark Karpeles writes: “As there is a lot of speculation regarding MtGox and its future, I would like to use this opportunity to reassure everyone that I am still in Japan, and working very hard with the support of different parties to find a solution to our recent issues.”


In his statement, Karpeles says more information will be released soon: “I would like to kindly ask that people refrain from asking questions to our staff: they have been instructed not to give any response or information. Please visit this page for further announcements and updates.”


According to an apparent Mt Gox crisis document, which has been widely circulated online, the company is considering shutting down trading for an entire month while it rebrands itself as ‘Gox’, brings in new management, and employs a fresh set of technical staff. The document is not officially confirmed, but internet messenger conversations detailed on Fox Business appear to show Karpeles telling industry consultant Jon Fisher that it is “more or less” legitimate. Mt Gox’s technical issues have been under the spotlight for the last two weeks, after the company blamed the Bitcoin Foundation for the “transaction malleability” issues that opened the currency to fraudulent manipulation. Many social media commenters said Mt Gox was a serious part of the problem after failing to update its own technology.In an interview with Forbes at the time, Karpeles said that Mt Gox had regularly upgraded its own Bitcoin implementation in order to keep pace with the developments set by the Foundation, but added that the exchange “couldn’t keep up with all the changes”.



Earlier this week, Karpeles resigned from his seat on the board of the Bitcoin Foundation. He has not responded to requests for further comment.


source: http://www.forbes.com/sites/leoking/2014/02/26/mt-gox-ceo-mark-karpeles-i-am-still-in-japan/



Wednesday, February 26, 2014

MTGOX SUBPOENAED BY US PROSECUTOR

MtGox has been subpoenaed by the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York, the Wall Street Journal’s Christopher M. Matthews reports.


An unnamed source tells him simply that federal prosecutors sent the subpoena this month. A spokesman for the U.S. Attorney’s office in New York decline to comment to BI.

MtGox shut trading operations last night over what it says were “recent news reports and the potential repercussions on MtGox’s operations and the market.”

Soon after the WSJ broke the story, Reuters reported that Japanese authorities were also looking into the Tokyo-based exchange.

“At this stage the relevant financial authorities, the police, the Finance Ministry and others are gathering information on the case,” Chief Cabinet Secretary Yoshihide Suga said in a news conference, according to Reuters. MtGox has effectively been blackballed within the Bitcoin community. Six of the largest Bitcoin firms published a statement last night denouncing Gox’s violation of users’ trust, and Gox resigned its position on the Bitcoin Foundation this past weekend. Meanwhile, Fox News Business’ Kathryn Glass says she has obtained a chat transcript conducted by a consultant named Jon Fisher with MtGox CEO Mark Karpeles in which Karpeles claims he is still working to save the firm. Karpeles also says a leaked report indicating a massive, ongoing theft at MtGox, was “more or less legit” but that the document itself had not been produced by Gox. Business Insider has unsuccessfully tried to reach out to Karpeles, although the Mt. Gox CEO did respond to Reuters via email.

“We should have an official announcement ready soon-ish,” he wrote, without providing more details or revealing his location. “We are currently at a turning point for the business. I can’t tell much more for now as this also involves other parties.”



source: http://www.businessinsider.com/report-mtgox-subpoenaed-by-us-prosecutor-2014-2



Tuesday, February 25, 2014

GOX Crisis Strategy Draft

For several weeks MtGox customers have been affected by bitcoin withdrawal issues that

compounded on themselves.


Publicly, MtGox declared that “transaction malleability” caused the

system to be subject to theft, and that something needed to be done by the core devs to fix it.

Gox’s own workaround solution was criticized, and eventually a fix was provided by

Blockchain.info.

The truth, it turns out, is that the damage had already been done.

At this point 744,408 BTC are missing due to malleability-related theft which went

unnoticed for several years. The cold storage has been wiped out due to a leak in the hot

wallet.

The reality is that MtGox can go bankrupt at any moment, and certainly deserves to as a

company. However, with Bitcoin/crypto just recently gaining acceptance in the public eye, the

likely damage in public perception to this class of technology could put it back 5~10 years, and

cause governments to react swiftly and harshly. At the risk of appearing hyperbolic, this could be

the end of Bitcoin, at least for most of the public.

We believe in the value of Bitcoin, its potential to change the world, and its principles of

transparency. Most importantly we care about the customers of MtGox and other bitcoin-based

businesses who will be affected.

The likely consequences will be larger than this localized financial damage, and we believe that

the benefits of keeping MtGox stable and running outweigh the risks. This isn’t about saving

MtGox anymore.


To avoid a chaotic situation, we propose:

1- Immediately reduce liabilities as much as possible with partners

With actual assets using arbitrage/ injecting new coins to erase them from the books. Informing and

asking selected Bitcoin main players to ask for their help. The MtGox price is low, making it possible

to erase a significant portion of the debt, but it needs to be done quickly. Injections in coin are most

useful (enough to run the exchange) but some cash is also needed to not run a fractional reserve.

2- Switch off the MtGox exchange temporarily (1 month) while announcing a restructuring and

re-branding

On a freshly branded static homepage, post a letter from Mark Karpelès stepping down as CEO of

MtGox, bringing in transition advisors, and citing poor organization and technology. Moving to a new

country (Singapore?) could be helpful.

3- Push the new branding (ready) and reset all SNS channels for communication:

Using Facebook, Twitter, etc with the new branding, we will give constant updates, changing the tone

of communications and informing stakeholders on all progress: new advisors, team members,

location, fee structure. We need to inspire confidence.

4- Set up a competent team and redesign the service and codebase:

Announce a new CEO, talented developers, and trusted business people to establish a new business

model. ( Finance, marketing strategy, IT, developers, Customer support). Build a low-cost, profitable

business again that gives customers a reason to stay (low fees, stability, etc) while we work off our

debts to stakeholders.


Part 1: To reduce liabilities

The stakeholders of MtGox are not the owners, but everyone in Bitcoin. This is sad

but the reality.

The current situation will negatively affect everyone who owns or operates in Bitcoin.

We will need to inject fresh coins inside the system in order to establish a basis to

eventually clear the books by running the exchange (perhaps 200,000 coins). The

costs of not doing so are incalculable at this stage.

Support from Bitcoin big players and core community – long term, high

leverage:

Coins for equity, coin donations, and cash injections to buy coins at the cheap

MtGox price are some options among many.

Bet on future profit to refill the lost coins – Long term, low leverage:

Regardless of malleability and regulatory issues, MtGox’s main problems are

massive robbery and poor bitcoin accounting. However, the business as an

exchange is highly profitable and healthy when run properly.


Part 2: Shut down MtGox.com, launch new branding

Big focus on the future

Letter from the CEO


Admitting his errors and expressing desire to fix the situation by

stepping back as a CEO. Blaming the technology implementation

which was not sized and designed to deal with such level of

transactions or to deal with malleability.


It’s time to step up and face reality by bringing a transition of

respected advisors who will run things properly.


In Japan, a CEO cannot resign until a new CEO is nominated. In that

case customers knows that MtGox is still around and working, but

under new management. Try to reduce the impact and raise

stakeholder confidence, and eventually get Mark out.


New branding, means that there are future-forward plans already in

the works, and customers will see that MtGox actually has a plan in

motion


Part 3: 1 month transition while updating the

industry

In order for stakeholders to follow up on MtGox progress, we will use SNS

platforms with constant positive communications.


- Every new milestone reached will be announced: Team members, new

marketing, progress on the technology implementation etc…


- The Customer support will stay operational to deal with people who

want to have access to their account/history


- During this period, the advisory board will be created, hopefully a new

CEO can be chosen and try to reset and secure the trading engine platform.


Expertise to find: Analysts, top class developers (crypto), IT security expert,

marketing, Bitcoin experts, economists, execs (CFO, COO, CMO, etc)


Part 4: MtGox becomes Gox

To avoid a bank run from customers, the daily amount of bitcoin and cash

withdrawals will be limited.

With the profit, a meticulous analysis will be made over the coming years

to clean the bitcoin balance sheet while running the exchange and

generating revenue to pay back stakeholders.

New offerings such as additional currencies, low trading fees, etc will give

customers a reason to stay with MtGox.

The new branding is already complete, and new services such as the

Bitpocket wallet are already developed and ready for deployment.

With a new image, team, and offering we believe that it will be a

challenge, but is not impossible. The risks of not acting are incredibly

large and unpredictable.




Monday, February 24, 2014

MtGox chief Mark Karpeles quits Bitcoin Foundation

The chief executive of Bitcoin exchange MtGox, Mark Karpeles, has quit the board of the Bitcoin Foundation, which oversees and develops Bitcoin software.


It comes shortly after MtGox halted transfers of the digital currency to external addresses after it spotted what it called “unusual activity”.

The halt resulted in a sharp decline in the value of Bitcoins.

Last week, MtGox – one of the largest Bitcoin exchanges – said customers should be able withdraw funds “soon”.

Meanwhile, all tweets on MtGox’s Twitter account have also been deleted.

The Bitcoin Foundation said that Mr Karpeles’s resignation would be “effective immediately”.

It is the foundation’s second high-profile resignation in the past month.

Another board member, Charles Shrem, stepped down in late January after being arrested and charged with money laundering in connection with his Bitcoin company.

Mr Shrem, the chief executive of New York-based Bitcoin exchange BitInstant, has pleaded not guilty.


Dispute

The issues with MtGox had sparked a dispute between the exchange and the Bitcoin Foundation.

The Tokyo-based firm said that its investigation into the unusual activity revealed a loophole that could be exploited to fool the transaction process into sending double the correct number of Bitcoins.

It also left it vulnerable to attacks, which slowed down the rate at which coins could be bought and sold.

As it halted the withdrawals, MtGox had suggested that a flaw in the virtual currency’s underlying software was to blame for the problem.

“A bug in the Bitcoin software makes it possible for someone to use the Bitcoin network to alter transaction details to make it seem like a sending of Bitcoins to a Bitcoin wallet did not occur when in fact it did occur,” it had said in a statement.

“Since the transaction appears as if it has not proceeded correctly, the Bitcoins may be resent.”

However, Gavin Andresen, chief scientist at the Bitcoin Foundation, denied the problem was its fault.

“The issues that MtGox has been experiencing are due to an unfortunate interaction between MtGox’s highly customised wallet software, their customer support procedures, and an obscure (but long-known) quirk in the way transactions are identified and not due to a flaw in the Bitcoin protocol,” he told the BBC earlier this month.



Mark Karpelès, chief executive officer of Mt. Gox, the embattled Tokyo-based bitcoin exchange, resigned on Sunday from the board of the Bitcoin Foundation, according to a person familiar with the situation.The Bitcoin Foundation confirmed in a statement on its website that Mt. Gox had resigned its board seat and thanked Mt. Gox for its efforts in launching the group.

The move comes amid a string of long-standing technical issues that began last summer when Mt. Gox halted customer withdrawals in U.S. dollars.

The problems became more severe earlier this month when Mt. Gox halted all customer withdrawals, saying that a bug in the software for bitcoin allowed some users to alter transactions. The problems prompted CoinDesk to remove Mt. Gox from its bitcoin-pricing index earlier this month. The exchange told customers last week that it was still working on “reinitiating” bitcoin withdrawals. Mt. Gox is one of several industry representatives on the board of the foundation, a trade organization that advocates for the virtual currency.

Many investors in the bitcoin community had called for the resignation of Mr. Karpelès from the board of the Bitcoin Foundation, including a British-based marketing consultant who has posted an online petition calling for Mr. Karpelès’s removal.


A phone call to Mt. Gox’s office in Tokyo rang unanswered.

It is the foundation’s second high-profile resignation in the past month. Board member Charles Shrem stepped down in late January after being arrested and charged with money laundering in connection with his bitcoin company. Mr. Shrem has pleaded not guilty.

Mt. Gox bitcoins traded at around $191 in midday Monday trading in Tokyo, while the Coindesk index bitcoin traded at around $578.

The “discount at Mt Gox reflects the markets ongoing belief that bankruptcy is a high possibility,” said Mark T. Williams, who teaches finance at Boston University in an email on Friday. “They have a considerable customer base that remains prevented from getting their money out,” said Mr. Williams, who has expressed skepticism about bitcoin.

Eric Bosma, a 60-year-old part-time health-care worker from Mission, British Columbia, said he has been trading bitcoins for the past six months to try to earn some extra income, but hasn’t been able to withdraw his about 5.25 bitcoin in Mt. Gox despite repeated attempts. “I have contacted Mt. Gox many, many times in the past two weeks and all I get is what seems to be bot emails,” he said in an email. “All I want is my bitcoin back.”



source: http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303426304579401883794330454?mg=reno64-wsj&url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052702303426304579401883794330454.html & http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-26319247